The Great Replacement

If you live in England, Germany, Sweden, Holland, Austria, or in fact any Northern European nation, you may have noticed that your town/city has changed considerably over the past two decades. We’re not talking about technological advances or new architecture – no, we’re talking about mass third world immigration.

Around 1995, many of the Northern European nations seemed to simultaneously open their doors to immigrants from across the third world. Millions upon millions of people came to Northern Europe from Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Somalia and so on, and millions upon millions are still coming. The so-called migrant crisis of the last 18 months has added to this phenomenon, with millions of immigrants from multiple middle-eastern and African nations are descending on Europe. This poses a significant problem for the host nations. Due to sky-rocketing immigrant birth rates and declining unsustainable native birth rates, soon Germans will be a minority in Germany, the English will be a minority in England, the French will be a minority in France, and so on.

Some may ask why this matters, and what you and they must understand is that it really does matter. England has a particular culture and shared values for a reason, as does Germany, as does Sweden and so on. This culture and these values often differ from those in the middle-east or sub-Saharan Africa, and there is a fairly obvious reason for that, namely thousands of years of separate ethnic development. You cannot simply take millions of people out of Africa, place them in Norway, and expect them to become Norweigan. Instead, Norway will become like Africa (just without the warm weather).

This is where the title comes in: The Great Replacement.

As was explained previously, this act of placing millions of third world, non-European immigrants into European nations is not adding to the populas. Rather, it is replacing them, due to the fertility factors stated above. The “leaders” of our societies are knowingly displacing the native populations of Europe.

The term ‘The Great Replacement’ was coined by French author Renaud Camus, who argued that the native French people are being replaced by mass immigration. Camus was quite correct in saying this, and it applies to man European nations today.

Now, this is not conspiracy or rumour, this is fully functioning policy adopted by the nations in question and sanctioned at the highest level. In 2000, the United Nations released a report entitled ‘Replacement Migration’, which identifies the 10 countries with the lowest birth rates that have ageing populations. They see importing the third world as the solution to the problem of a dwindling labour market and an ageing population that is inevitably dependent on the state (taxpayer) more so than their younger compatriots. Do not take our word for it, the link to said report is here:

If you require anymore confirmation that this is in fact a fully sanctioned UN policy, briefly view the tweets of the UN High Representative for Migration, Peter Sutherland at @PDSutherlandUN

The leaders and influential elites of the European nations have signed up to this ideal in full. The eradication of native Europeans seems to be just good business to these people. One only has to look back at when then French President Nikolas Sarkozy said on television that ‘miscegenation is the duty’ of Europe, and if people did not breed with non-native immigrants willingly then ‘the state will have to move in with more coercive methods’. Similarly, influential British journalist Andrew Marr wrote in a piece for the Guardian back in the late 1990s that the answer to all out problems is ‘vigorous miscegenation’ and that ‘state repression’ is required. There are propaganda videos in Sweden encouraging white women to procreate with African men, and Olympic opening ceremonies displaying the black man and the white woman as the ideal of modern family life. Everywhere you look, state-sanctioned diversity is being forced down the throats of our peoples.

One question that never gets asked is why do the elites of the west see replacement migration as the only option? After all, birth rates are only low in Northern European nations thanks to Marxist social engineering policies. Why can the state not implement measures to encourage native families to have more children? Why can the state not bring in measures to increase productivity and therefore tax revenue in the nations in question? Why is it that the only option they wish to pursue is the total destruction of the ethnic and cultural order of Europe?

This is not a new phenomenon, however, regardless of how recent the UN report may be. Back in 1923, a man named Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi founded the Pan-Europa movement, an influential lobby group backed by the most powerful bankers in Europe and the United States of America (the usual culprits). Kalergi wrote a book, Practical Idealism, which set out his view for the future of Europe where he claimed “The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.”

Here is what the Western Spring website had to say about Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi:

Few people know that one of the main initiators of the process of European integration, was also the man who designed the genocide plan of the Peoples of Europe. It is a dark person, whose existence is unknown to the masses, but the elite considers him as the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove Kalergi. His father was an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis) and his mother the Japanese Mitsu Aoyama. Kalergi, thanks to his close contacts with all European aristocrats and politicians, due to the relationships of his nobleman-diplomat father, and by moving behind the scenes, away from the glare of publicity, he managed to attract the most important heads of state to his plan , making them supporters and collaborators for the “project of European integration”.

In 1922 he founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna, which aimed to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be the first step in creating a world government. Among the first supporters, including Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš and the banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks. The Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next president of Austria, Karl Renner, took the responsibility for leading the “Pan-European” movement. Later, French politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi, etc will offer their help.

With the rise of Fascism in Europe, the project was abandoned*

and the “Pan-European” movement was forced to dissolve, but after the Second World War, Kalergi, thanks to frantic and tireless activity and the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish Masonic Lodge B’nai B’rith and major newspapers like the New York Times, the plan manages to be accepted by the United States Government. The CIA later undertakes the completion of the project.

*Note: Kalergi got the agreement of every major European leader to press ahead with this ideal of European integration, besides Mussolini and Adolf Hitler.

Whilst it would be some stretch to say that the Western leaders of today are following in the vision of this historical figure, it does appear that they are ensuring that its implementation, even if only as a consequence of their actions as opposed to the stated aim. Take what you will from this evidence and make your own conclusions.

One conclusion that is virtually undeniable is that the native populations of much of Europe are being displaced. They are being forced to accept the complete annihilation of their ethnic and cultural identities against their will. Rich, diverse, beautiful cultures that have been built up over thousands of years hang in the balance, and it is not some foreign invader or mighty tyrant that is doing this to us, it is our own leaders, our own kith and kin.

Now, a problem can only be solved when it is widely acknowledged that there is a problem in the first place. If you do not see the destruction of the ethnic and cultural identities of your homeland as a problem, then you are in the wrong place. If you, however, like many others do in fact think this is a problem and it does make you angry, then do not stand on the sidelines. It is your duty to help make your people aware in order to stop the madness that has engulfed our political class.

This problem can be solved and its effects reversed, but only if we have the courage to stand up and be counted. Not a single one of us can make a change by ourselves, but together, we can defend our European nations from globalist tyranny.